All Projects
(02)
One Pixel of Truth
A trusted digital hub connecting fashion designers with verified material suppliers, anchored by a single, transparent sustainability score.
Project type
Product Design, B2B Platform UX, Fashion-tech & Sustainability
Project role
Lead Product Designer, UX Research, IA, UI Design
Date
2026
01
Overview
02
The problem
Cluster A · Trust
01
Lack of trust in sustainability claims
Unreliable data and greenwashing, with no way to check a claim.
04
Supplier transparency gaps
Little visibility into material origins or production practices.
Cluster B · Access
02
Fragmented sourcing ecosystem
Materials scattered across directories, certification sites and word-of-mouth.
06
Insufficient collaboration across the value chain
Brands, suppliers and recyclers operate in silos, so shared data moves slowly.
07
Weak incentives & rewards
Few systems motivate designers or consumers to choose circular materials.
Cluster C · Standards
03
Complex & inconsistent certifications
Competing certification frameworks create confusion about what a badge means.
05
Limited education & awareness
Designers lack grounding in sustainability standards and materials science.
08
No standardized sustainability data
No unified metric exists to compare materials, so decisions stay subjective.
03
The solution
01 / trust
02 / access
03 / standards
PSI: The Pixel Sustainability Index

04
Impact
01
Trust gap
Certification library linked to registries
Every credential resolves to its issuing body with a time-stamped audit record, so verification happens inside the platform rather than in a browser tab.
Every
Designer interviewed asked some version of “is this greenwashing?” about the claims they encounter.
02
Fragmentation
Supplier profiles inside the hub
The sourcing trail is visible, sourcing, contacts and certification history sit on the material itself instead of reconstructed.
#1
Pain point across every user group: no centralized, trusted source.
03
Complexity
PSI : one standardized score
Testing showed structure worked but the mission was invisible. A single 0–100 score gave the value proposition a place to appear.
6 → 1
Usability pain points shared one root cause; one metric answered it. Zero participants had named the mission before.
Read the full case study →







